2007年3月13日

Spies, Lies & KPMG; An inside look at how the accounting giant was infiltrated by private intelligence firm Diligence

這是 Business Week 所報導一個 auditor 涉入商業間諜案的真實案例。在 Knowledge Office 發佈給所有員工的同一天,我就一口氣看完,當下覺得有些不可思議。因為這個 auditor 還真的不是普通蠢、不是普通白目!他以為他是 007 James Bond 嗎?

隔沒幾天,本所執行長就要人把故事簡單翻譯成中文,寄給所有的同仁「警惕」(後面當然加上如果此是發生於本所同仁,將如何如何...)

有空的話,再來全部翻譯成中文...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

諸位同仁:

因受誘惑、畏懼或其他原因,致洩漏機密之情事,於各類間諜片中經常上演。以下是一個發生在國外的真實故事報導,而且與會計師事務所的從業人員有關,希望同仁能花一點時間加以閱讀,並深深引以為戒:


風險管理真實個案:
間諜、謊言與 KPMG(摘錄自 Business Week 2/26/07)

案情摘要:

2005 年春天,服務於 KPMG 百慕達管理顧問部門的蓋瑞,接到一通來自尼克的電話,尼克宣稱他有極重要的事須和他碰面。 其後的兩次會面,尼克設法讓蓋瑞誤信其為英國中情局官員,且須取得 KPMG 某專案資料。然而,這些資料並未送到英國中情局。尼克的實際身份是前英國中情局官員,目前則是華盛頓 Diligence 偵探公司的創始人之一,從事商業間諜活動 。而 BG&R (華盛頓舉足輕重的遊說集團,代表蘇俄 Alfa Group 財團)是尼克的客戶, Alfa 公司的頭號競爭者-IPOC 公司,其審計會計師事務所正是 KPMG 百慕達分所。蘇俄 Alfa Group 企業聯盟透過其子公司委任 BG&R 調查 IPOC,此時 Alfa 正與 IPOC 爭奪蘇俄最大電信公司的股權。

BG&R 委請尼克調查並取得 IPOC 的機密資訊。一開始,Diligence 公司的員工佯裝成客戶與KPMG 百慕達分所聯絡,並進而得知可能取得 IPOC 資訊的員工名單。其後,Diligence 公司再從此名單進一步分析並篩選可能較易洩密的人,最後決定從蓋瑞下手。尼克開始與蓋瑞聯繫並使其相信他是英國中情局的一員,需要蓋瑞的配合以完成一件與國家安全相關的專案,且此專案與 KPMG 有關。Diligence 公司對蓋瑞作了一番幾可亂真的身家調查後,並與蓋瑞達成協議,在他去 KPMG 上班的途中將有關 IPOC 的審計工作底稿及其他審計相關資料放在一個尼克指定的隱密處所,以便尼克自行取得。後來蓋瑞亦收受了尼克所贈送的一只價值不斐的勞力士手錶,而且更不可思議的是,蓋瑞還相信那是英國政府透過尼克致贈的禮物!

2005 年 10 月 18 日,一位匿名告密者將 Diligence 公司與此案的相關文件放在 KPMG 的新澤西辦公室,事情因而爆發。

教訓與啟發:若上述的蓋瑞服務於 PwC,他就違反了下列政策:....[Deleted]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business Week 2007/2/26 By Eamon Javers

In the spring of 2005, Guy Enright, an accountant at KPMG Financial Advisory Services Ltd. in Bermuda, got a call from a man identifying himself in a crisp British accent as Nick Hamilton. Hamilton said he needed to see Enright about matters of utmost importance.

Over the course of two meetings, Hamilton led Enright to believe he was a British intelligence officer, according to a person familiar with the encounters. He told Enright he wanted information about a KPMG project that Hamilton said had national security implications for Britain. Soon, Enright, who was born in Britain, was depositing confidential audit documents in plastic containers at drop-off points designated by Hamilton.

But Nick Hamilton was not an agent of Her Majesty's secret service, and the documents never found their way to the British government.

Nick Hamilton was in fact Nick Day, now 38, a onetime British agent and co-founder of Diligence Inc., a Washington private intelligence firm that counts William Webster, former director of the CIA and FBI, among its advisory board members. Diligence's client was not Britain's Queen, but Barbour Griffith & Rogers, one of the most formidable lobbying firms in Washington. Barbour Griffith represented a Russian conglomerate whose archrival, IPOC International Growth Fund Ltd., was being audited by KPMG's Bermuda office.

A 2006 scandal involving Hewlett-Packard Co. put the issue of corporate espionage in the headlines. Diligence's methods, revealed in court documents and interviews by BusinessWeek, show how far some in the corporate investigation business will go.

'PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY'

Without denying this account of events in Bermuda, Diligence's Day says: "We've always respected the laws of the jurisdictions in which we operate." He adds that corporate intelligence firms like his provide an invaluable service. "We essentially help businesses deal with the risks of operating in challenging markets," Day says. "It's a role which government agencies don't necessarily have the resources or understanding to be able to fulfill."

From the start, Diligence's goal was clear, if far from simple: Infiltrate KPMG to obtain advance information about the audit of IPOC, an investment fund based in Bermuda. Russian conglomerate Alfa Group Consortium hired Barbour Griffith & Rogers through a subsidiary, and the lobbying firm in turn hired Diligence. Alfa is dueling with IPOC for a large stake in the Russian telecom company MegaFon. "We have a good chance of success on this project," Day wrote in an internal Diligence memo, referring to the Bermuda espionage effort. The memo, which BusinessWeek reviewed, added: "We are doing it in a way which gives plausible deniability, and therefore virtually no chance of discovery." Similar Diligence operations, the memo noted, had been successful before.

Within Diligence the KPMG campaign was dubbed Project Yucca, and it unfolded in stages, according to people familiar with the operation and documents filed in a court proceeding involving IPOC and Alfa in the British Virgin Islands. First, two Diligence employees contacted KPMG's Bermuda offices pretending to be organizers of a legal conference on the island, according to a person familiar with the operation. The Diligence staff members called KPMG secretaries and asked about how the office worked. Soon, Diligence had the names of a handful of KPMG employees who might have access to the IPOC data. But Diligence wanted to narrow the list.

The intelligence firm was originally looking for people who fit one of two profiles for sources likely to leak the audit information, according to a Project Yucca planning memo. One personality type was a "male in his mid-20s who is somewhat bored...has a propensity to party hard, needs cash, enjoys risk, likes sports, likes women, is disrespectful of his managers, fiddles his expenses, but is patriotic." The memo described the second personality type as "a young female who is insecure, overweight, bitchy, not honest. Someone who spends money on her looks, clothes, gadgets. Has no boyfriend, and only superficial friends. Has a strong relationship with her mother." Apparently, no one on Diligence's list quite fit either profile, but the firm settled on Enright, the British-born accountant.

Enright soon got a call from Diligence's Nick Day, posing as Nick Hamilton, according to a person familiar with the situation. The two agreed to meet for lunch near the KPMG offices in Hamilton, Bermuda. At lunch, Day, who is dark-haired and has a warm smile, said the assignment he had in mind for Enright was top secret and involved Britain's national security. Day kept the conversation vague, never mentioning IPOC or the audit, according to the person familiar with the situation. Day told the accountant he would have to undergo a British government background check to ensure that he was up to the task. Day produced an official-looking--but fake--questionnaire with a British government seal at the top and asked for information about Enright's parents, his professional background, any criminal history, and political activities, according to a copy of the questionnaire reviewed by BusinessWeek. Enright provided the information.

Several weeks later the two men met again, this time in a local bar, says the person familiar with the events. Day, still calling himself Nick Hamilton, told war stories from what he said were his days in the Royal Navy's Special Boat Service, Britain's equivalent of the U.S. Navy SEALS. He then steered the conversation toward his real interest: What did Enright know about the KPMG audit of IPOC?

Soon, Enright was handing over confidential audit documents, including transcripts of interviews KPMG had conducted in the IPOC investigation, according to court documents on file in the British Virgin Islands and the source familiar with the events. Day picked out a rock in a field along Enright's 20-minute daily commute from his home in Elbow Beach and placed a plastic container under the rock, creating what spies call a dead drop site. At appointed times, Enright slipped new material into the container, which Day later retrieved. On one occasion, Enright left documents in the storage compartment of his moped, which he parked at his home. Enright had told Diligence employees where he hid the keys to the moped. When Enright left for a trip, Day collected the papers, according to the person familiar with the situation.

Day and Diligence took elaborate precautions to make sure Enright wasn't himself a plant or a corporate spy, people familiar with the events say. Diligence employees followed Enright from his office to every meeting with Day. A Diligence employee was at each meeting spot before the men arrived to determine whether Enright was using associates for surveillance. Enright was followed to his destinations when meetings ended. When Day left the meetings with Enright, the source says, the Diligence executive followed a process spies call dry cleaning, which was designed to detect whether Day was being followed. He walked a prescribed route through several narrow "choke points" that made it possible for Diligence employees to identify anyone who might have been tailing him.

MYSTERY WHISTLEBLOWER

Diligence was paid handsomely for its work. An invoice produced in a federal court proceeding in Washington involving IPOC and Diligence shows that Barbour Griffith was billed by Diligence "For Bermuda report and Germany work--A Telecom." Diligence was paid $25,000 a month, plus $10,000 a month for expenses, according to documents reviewed by BusinessWeek and an interview with a person familiar with the matter. The company was also paid a $60,000 bonus for acquiring the first draft of KPMG's audit of IPOC. Diligence's total take couldn't be determined.

The undercover Project Yucca ended after someone--it remains unclear who--dropped a bundle of papers at the Montvale (N.J.) office of KPMG on Oct. 18, 2005. The papers included Diligence business records and e-mails with details of Project Yucca.

On Nov. 10, 2005, KPMG Financial Advisory Services sued Diligence for fraud and unjust enrichment in U.S. District Court in Washington. On June 20, 2006, the case settled. Diligence paid KPMG $1.7 million, according to a person familiar with the settlement.

On June 15, 2006, IPOC sued both Diligence and Barbour Griffith & Rogers in the same District Court, alleging civil conspiracy, unjust enrichment, and other misdeeds. That case is pending. Gavin Houlgate, a spokesman for KPMG, declined comment, as did attorneys for KPMG at the New York law firm Hughes Hubbard & Reed. Kirill Babaev, a vice-president at Alfa's telecom arm in Moscow, said in a statement when asked about Alfa's involvement in the Diligence operation: "We are...not a party in any litigation with IPOC, and therefore cannot comment on any rumours or speculations in this regard."

Barbour Griffith & Rogers' most famous co-founder is Haley Barbour, who is now governor of Mississippi. Barbour left the lobbying firm in 2003, before the Diligence operation began. Another Barbour Griffith co-founder, Ed Rogers, was an early investor in Diligence. The lobbying firm rented space at its Pennsylvania Avenue offices to Diligence. Edward MacMahon, a lawyer for Barbour Griffith, says the firm has done nothing wrong and that no one affiliated with Barbour Griffith currently has an equity stake in Diligence. A person familiar with Diligence says the firm's shareholders are CEO Day, former U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Burt, Edward Mathias of Washington-based private equity firm Carlyle Group, and Buenos Aires private equity firm Exxel Group. Burt confirms he is Diligence's chairman but declines to discuss Project Yucca. Mathias confirms he is an investor in Diligence but says he is unaware of the Bermuda events. Exxel Group lists Diligence among its portfolio companies on its corporate Web site but did not respond to an e-mail seeking comment.

It's unclear whether Diligence broke any British or American laws. In an interview at his Washington office, Day says he and his firm always stay within the law but have learned much since 2005: "As an organization we've changed a lot as a result of everything we've been through in the last year." He says Diligence has "spent a lot of time training our staff as to what they can and cannot do."

In a statement to BusinessWeek, IPOC director Mads Braemer-Jensen said: "The fact that Alfa hired Barbour Griffith & Rogers and Diligence to use illegal and dishonest smear tactics against IPOC just shows that Alfa is trying to change the subject away from the fact that they stole from IPOC. We hope the U.S. and Bermuda law enforcement authorities will make note of this and take appropriate action against Alfa."

Guy Enright, who now works for Deloitte & Touche in London, declined repeated requests for comment on his relationship with Nick Day and his work on the IPOC audit. The terms of Enright's departure from KPMG couldn't be determined. But he apparently didn't come away empty-handed from his encounters with Nick Day.

As Project Yucca wound down in 2005, Day, still in the guise of Nick Hamilton, gave Enright a Rolex watch worth thousands of dollars, according to two people familiar with the present. Enright was led to believe it was a thank-you gift from the British government, but it, too, came from Diligence.

Deep Connections

Diligence, which bills itself as an "intelligence gathering and risk management firm," has extensive political and business ties. The firm's Web site lists an advisory board that includes:

Michael Howard

Former leader of Conservative Party in Britain

Edward Mathias

Managing director of private equity firm Carlyle Group

William Webster

Former director of the CIA and the FBI

會計師 律師 建築師 醫師 擬提高收費下限

如果金管會可以「金檢」銀行的「訂價策略」,聲稱自己管的是「風險」而不是「價格」,而公平會不吭一聲。那會計師業何不也自行訂個「訂價策略」,竭誠邀請金管來檢查檢查?

成本不同,價格自然不同。現在國內法令規定繁瑣,審計及會計準則亦日趨複雜,審計公費卻不見提升,與中國或香港比起來還低了一截,如此如何可能提升審計品質。畢竟服務業不同於製造業。會計師業最大的「原料」成本就是人力,遵循法令及準則的成本越來越高,這可不是什麼「製程改善」、「流程改善」就可以降低成本的。

公平會真是管太多,而金管會真是管得不好!


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

會計師 律師 建築師 醫師 擬提高收費下限
2007/3/13 工商時報 楊穆郁/台北報導

會計師、律師、建築師、醫師四種專門職業的公會,日前舉行「四師聯誼會」,有鑑於行業別的特性,對於公平交易法上規定不得訂收費下限的規定,「四師聯誼會」達成共識,將建請政府修改法令,放寬對設定收費標準的管理,以避免惡性競爭,進而影響執業品質。

「四師聯誼會」共同認為,專門職業和一般銷售商品、貨物不同,有必要維持一定品質,不宜流於殺價競爭,因此,各公會訂定收費標準、或設有收費底限,並非為了壟斷、聯合哄抬價格,而是為了避免一味殺價的惡性競爭。

會計公會全國聯合會理事長林敏弘表示,會計師公會原本訂有「會計師會員收費標準」,並規定對收費較收費標準下限低太多者,將移送會計師懲戒委員會,然而卻被告到公平會,認為有違公平交易法。

林敏弘表示,主管單位要求會計師簽證必須維持一定品質,而且最近幾年新會計處理準則公報不斷推陳出新,證交法、商業會計法等法令修正案,對會計師查核工作的要求越來越多,若不維持一定的收費水準,是很難維持會計師服務品質的。

林敏弘表示,專門職業的執行不比商品銷售,可以開放業者全面性的價格競爭,尤其會計師的服務品質,攸關企業財報的品質,會計師的工作,基本上是在為資本市場和工商環境把關的,如果會計師公費也毫無管制的任由市場機制決定,則殺價的最後發展,必然很難維持良好的執業品質,最後受傷害的還是社會大眾,進而影響會計師的聲譽。

基於行業特性及服務品質的考量,四師聯誼會決議,將建請政府對於專門職業的執業收費標準,可授權各公會進行某種程度的規範。

林敏弘另外表示,四師聯誼會也擬建議,對浮動薪資的行業之勞退金提撥,可以每月按實際提撥情況彙總申報即可,不必每當提撥比率有變動時,即必須先向勞委會申報,因為浮動薪資者,每月薪水是視業績好壞而變動的,不可能每月按固定比率提撥退休金。

公平會:聯合行為就不行
譚淑珍/台北報導

會計師、律師、建築師、醫師四師有意透過修法程序,提高最低收費標準,以抑止惡性競爭,公平會發言人林益裕指出,公平法是鼓勵競爭,也不允許聯合行為,即使是透過修法的過程,他也說,公平法為特別法,依據公平法第四條規定,任何法若抵觸公平法,是優先適用公平法,也就是說,無論用什麼方法,就是不能有聯合行為。

有關各別行業間訂價的問題,林益裕說,公平會通常透過主管事業機關反應,反應的立場,也是從鼓勵競爭的角度,要求自由訂定價格。鼓勵競爭、定價自由都是公平法立法的宗旨,因此,任何抵觸公平法的行為,公平會都不會允許。

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

放款定價政策 將列金檢重點
2007/01/22 聯合報/記者邱金蘭/台北報導

金管會政策決定從五月一日起,將金融機構放款定價政策列金檢重點,一旦被查獲未依資金、損失等成本訂定放款利率,將被處分,這項新措施將對企業、不動產及消費性放款等產生重大影響,尤以目前利率水準偏低的房屋貸款將首當其衝。

力霸風暴引爆的中華銀行弊案,凸顯金融機構風險管理仍待加強,為使銀行落實風險評估,金管會決定要求所有金融機構採行放款定價政策,適用對象包括銀行、保險公司及信合社,範圍則包括企業放款、聯貸、房貸、汽車貸款及不動產等放款業務。

最近幾年因市場資金充裕,房貸利率惡性殺價嚴重,在低利刺激下,購屋住宅貸款迅速攀升,去年十月底占放款總額比重已高達百分之廿六。新措施將使銀行經營更加穩健,但短期內也將衝擊房貸市場,會否進一步影響房地產市場交易,值得觀察。

這一、兩年受雙卡呆帳等因素,銀行獲利大幅縮水,去年十一月底有廿一家虧損,金管會官員表示,銀行獲利持續縮水,除未擺脫雙卡呆帳陰影外,銀行不惜成本在房貸等授信業務上殺價競爭,也是原因。原本金管會有意藉由銀行公會自訂規範方式,推動放款定價政策,結果引來外界質疑此舉是否有聯合行為之嫌等誤解,金管會決定自行透過監理措施推動。

根據金管會這項規定,金融機構應參酌可貸資金成本、營運成本、預期損失、金融市場資金現況及其他經營策略考量等因素,訂定合理的放款定價政策,董事會並應定期審視、檢討。金融機構內部稽核單位也應將執行放款定價政策情形,納入查核項目。

金管會說,一旦發現金融機構未依規定辦理,如放款利率的訂定未合理評估成本,以壓低利率搶業務時,將予以處分。如果被發現預期損失的成本有低估時,金管會還可能要求金融機構增提損失準備。 【2007/01/22 聯合報】

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

新聞分析》管的是風險 不是價格
【經濟日報/記者 邱金蘭】

一度引發爭議的金融機構放款定價政策,終於要在5月1日上路,這項強化風險管理的新監理措施,不但會影響市場利率,風險成本相對高的弱質金融機構,將更難生存。

金融機構是經營信用的行業,風險當然是最重要的成本,但因風險不易預測,部分金融機構為求達到業績或考慮其他因素,很容易忽略風險。

中華銀弊案暴露銀行對關聯戶授信集中,引爆的嚴重問題,是沒有做好風險管理的活生生教材,近年來金融機構拚命衝刺雙卡業務,被雙卡呆帳拖累,也是忽略風險的結果。

這種不管風險的經營模式,最近似乎有移轉到房貸市場的隱憂,房貸利率惡性殺價嚴重,為整頓市場秩序,金管會決定推動金融機構放款定價政策。

這項政策最初委由銀行公會研議時,一度因誤解引來聯合行為等爭議,但定價政策只是一個機制,既是依各銀行不同成本訂出的合理利率,最後價格當然也有所差異,這項監理措施管的是「風險」,不是「價格」。

體質好的銀行,因風險管理佳,可能的損失成本低,資金成本也少,訂出的合理利率水準,相對就低。反之,體質較差的銀行,因風險管理不佳,可能的損失成本原本就高,從市場取得的資金成本也高,在各種成本墊高情況下,訂出的合理利率水準,當然比好銀行訂的利率來得高。

在一高、一低情勢下,這項新的措施,將使弱質金融機構失去市場競爭力,好銀行、壞銀行,更加兩極化,加速體質不佳的金融機構與其他機構合併或退出市場。

監理機關在整頓市場秩序之餘,在金融機構退場機制上應有更充分的準備與因應,讓沒有競爭力的金融機構能順利退出市場,不能再發生爛攤子丟給國庫,由全民埋單的情況。 【2007/01/22 經濟日報】

高風險下生存之道 會計師事務所 重質不重量

目前的市場現況就是主管機關金管會只管處罰,不管品質,一切都要到出事了才來究責。至於會計師有沒有承接查核上市櫃公司的能力則一概不論。 金管會至少平常還會去金檢銀行和保險公司,怎麼不見金管會來檢查會計師事務所呢?

至於重質不重量到底有沒有用,就要看客戶的反應了。如果客戶對於公司治理和審計品質不甚要求,光是重質不重量只會讓營業額持續下滑而已。


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

高風險下生存之道 會計師事務所 重質不重量
2007/3/13 經濟日報 記者王慧馨

揮別力霸事件帶給會計圈的震撼教育後,四大會計師事務所的新年新希望都是「重品質更勝數量」。在追求合理成長的前提下,新的一年會計師事務所不只希望業務成長,更重要的是慎選客戶,做好品質及風控管理。

資誠會計師事務所副執行長高文宏說,「四大事務所目前面臨的競爭是品質」。因為四大事務所在台灣市場是命運共同體,一旦有會計師被懲戒,沒有一家事務所會開心,因為對整體產業的形象都不好。

高文宏指出,審計未來要走向「品質取勝」,不是比價格,而是看是否能協助企業及早發現問題;簽證財報也不只是會計師簽名就好,還要提供更多加值服務,查核標準也要更嚴格。

安侯建業會計師事務所創辦人朱寶奎則觀察,台灣會計市場近年陷入高風險困境的關鍵之一,就是會計師事務所間低價搶客戶,有的案子作業不敷成本,會計師只好偷工減料,使審計品質無法提升;有的會計師為了平衡收支,只好接下過多的案量,以至沒時間深入了解客戶。

到目前為止,殺價競爭的情形仍然存在,大家都在等誰先撐不下去、接收市場,但至今還沒人垮下來。

朱寶奎指出,美國的會計師事務所市場也同樣面臨低價競爭,但因處罰很重,小事務所多半不敢亂接案;香港、新加坡市場則是大家都有共識,如果客戶的會計制度不健全、有問題,就絕對不接,而且也不削價搶客。

資誠會計師事務所所長薛明玲說,長久以來,低公費就一直是四大的問題。過去會計圈笑稱台灣公費與香港、中國大陸差不多,「只是幣別不同」,也可見台灣會計師公費不合理低估的程度。但薛明玲認為,目前已到價格及風險權衡的關鍵時點,許多客戶對品質的要求更勝價格,因此他認對大家在「價格」會逐漸形成共識。

勤業眾信會計師事務所總裁張日炎也說,目前會計師事務所的隱憂,就是要加強風險管理,並提高服務品質。由於台灣會計市場已十分成熟,為了追求合理成長,今年開始勤業眾信對獲利性不夠好的客戶也會努力溝通,讓會計師享有合理報酬。

張日炎觀察,台灣會計師事務所成長與GDP成正相關,相關係數約為三倍,意即經濟成長率如果是4%,會計師事務所約可成長12%;與中國大陸市場相關係數約為五倍、每年大陸四大成長50%的高速相去甚遠。因此,在成長有限下,追求獲利便顯得更重要。去年台灣勤業眾信在德勤全球近150個國家的營收排名為第19名,獲利則是第17名。

安侯建業會計師事務所執行長馬國柱則認為,會計師事務所即將面臨的是「下一個十年的挑戰」。隨著國際化趨勢愈來愈明顯,未來台灣四大面對的可能是來自其他國家、同為會員所的國際競爭。只有比對方更強,才可能建立合作關係。因此,當務之急是將事務所的軟硬體加速國際化,才能先「卡到十年後的位」。

馬國柱說,金融市場及商品的發展愈來愈多樣,企業已開始走向全球集資的趨勢,會計師也必須及早建立全球服務的能力和知識,現階段或許還可以依賴與國外會員所的通力合作,十年後的會計業很可能比的是專業服務的團隊作戰能力。

薛明玲也認為,現在最關鍵的任務是把會計師訓練成有能力「逐水草而居」,要像台商一樣可到全球工作。台灣與香港、新加坡等地相比,國際化程度不夠,但只要會計師有本事逐水草而居,未來就不必擔心沒工作。他建議年輕會計師應具備語文、法律及管理能力。

在經歷博達、力霸案後,會計師有的被罰、有的被抓,薛明玲認為,會計師行業「已到谷底」,接下來正是很大的成長及發展空間。趁著四大會計師事務所今年都有很多人退休,薛明玲說,此時正是後起之秀進入市場的最好機會。

致遠會計師事務所董事長游朝堂則呼籲,政府應該想辦法鼓勵全世界台商回台上市。游朝堂說,日本及美國商人到全球各地設子公司及分公司,但他們都回到母國市場上市,因為上市後利潤就必須留在當地市場,分給當地股東,所以台灣應儘快吸引台商回流。

要是台商在其他地方上市,游朝堂說,利潤就會留在上市的國家,不但台灣的股東分享不到,政府也課不到稅。游朝堂認為,台灣近十幾年來經濟成長快速,資本市場扮演重要角色,對台商來說,如果沒有其他因素阻擋,最先考慮上市的地點一定是法令環境都熟悉的台灣。「只要打通任督二脈,台商就會回來,」游朝堂說。而台灣的資本市場跟著好轉,會計師的春天也就不遠了。